The most revealing stop on Bernie Parent’s path to a Stanley Cup was not far from the Spectrum. It was across Philadelphia, at the Civic Center, where a second professional hockey team played before modest crowds on a rink Parent came to dislike.
For one season, the future face of Flyers goaltending belonged to the Philadelphia Blazers of the World Hockey Association. Parent had left the NHL by choice, seeking a better contract. He had not expected his new team to be in Philadelphia at all. By the time the Blazers reached the playoffs, his dispute with the club over guaranteed pay had become serious enough that he stopped playing.
Then came the part that can disappear in a quick telling of his career: Parent could not simply leave the Blazers and rejoin the Flyers. Toronto still held his NHL rights. His return to Philadelphia required another club to make a deal. (inquirer.com)
Parent, who died in September 2025, is remembered above all as the goalie behind the Flyers’ first two Stanley Cups. That memory is secure. His year with the Blazers is less familiar, although it took place in the same city and ended only months before he began his championship season. It was neither a lost year nor a tidy prelude. It was a gamble that gave Parent more than one reason to reconsider where he wanted to play. (nhl.com)
He had already established himself in the NHL when he signed with the new WHA in 1972. After beginning his career with the Flyers, Parent had played for the Maple Leafs alongside Jacques Plante, the goaltender he had admired as a boy. Parent later credited Plante with helping him refine his positioning, balance and anticipation. The move to the WHA was not an escape from having nowhere else to play. By Parent’s account, he wanted more money than he was getting in Toronto and expected to remain with the Leafs before he took the new league’s offer. (inquirer.com)
That offer came from the Miami Screaming Eagles. The name suggested a new hockey market and a fresh start. The franchise, however, could not secure a suitable arena in Miami and never played a game there. Instead, it moved to Philadelphia and became the Blazers.
For Parent, the relocation produced an unusual homecoming. He was back in the city where he had begun his NHL career, but he was not back with the Flyers. Philadelphia now had rival major professional hockey teams, and their separate addresses said something about their different positions. The Flyers had the Spectrum. The Blazers, unable to make it their home, played at the older Civic Center. (inquirer.com)
The Blazers’ scheduled home opener on October 13, 1972, captured the difficulties of making that arrangement work. Ice cracked after the Zamboni came onto the surface. Spectators threw souvenir pucks onto the ice, and the game was postponed. Parent did not play a home opener that night because there was no game to play. (inquirer.com)
A cracked rink is an irresistible image, but it cannot stand in for an entire season. The Blazers did get on with theirs, and Parent carried a substantial share of the work. He appeared in 63 of the club’s 78 regular-season games and recorded 33 wins. Philadelphia started badly, losing its first seven games, and stood at 4–16 after a loss on November 25. Yet the team recovered sufficiently to finish third in the WHA’s East Division and reach the playoffs, winning 16 of its final 25 games. André Lacroix led the league with 124 points. (inquirer.com)
Those facts matter because the Blazers were not merely a punch line in a better-known goalie’s biography. They were a team with accomplished players that overcame a dreadful opening stretch. Parent’s season was substantial even as his circumstances grew less appealing to him.
Years later, Parent described crowds at the Civic Center as small compared with those he knew from NHL arenas. His estimates of the attendance on thin nights varied between interviews; they are best understood as his recollections, not official counts. He also recalled dissatisfaction with the rink and with the level of WHA play. These were his judgments after the fact, rather than a verdict on every player or team in the new league. They help explain, though, why being back in Philadelphia did not feel to him like being back where he belonged. (inquirer.com)
The sharper problem concerned his contract. Parent had entered the WHA for better compensation, but during the season he came to believe that the money meant to guarantee his pay was no longer secure. In later accounts, he said the Blazers had drawn from an escrow account intended to protect his salary. His description of precisely what happened to that money rests largely on those retrospective accounts. The underlying dispute is clearer: Parent wanted assurance that the club would honor its obligation, and the disagreement remained unresolved when the playoffs began. (inquirer.com)
Philadelphia lost its opening playoff game to Cleveland, 3–2. Parent did not play the rest of the series. An April 1973 newspaper report said he had refused to play unless the Blazers deposited a check guaranteeing his contract. Later accounts likewise tie his departure to the pay dispute, though they differ in some details. (inquirer.com)
It was an abrupt end to a season in which Parent had been the Blazers’ starting goalie and helped them get into the postseason. It also put the decision in an uncomfortable light for his teammates. Whatever the merits of his complaint, they had a playoff series to play without him. Former Blazers player-coach John McKenzie later questioned whether the team could trust Parent after he left. (inquirer.com)
Parent’s side of the story deserves to remain beside that reaction, not to erase it. He had made the jump to the WHA in large part because of a contract. A dispute over whether that contract was guaranteed went to the heart of his decision to join the league. There is no need to turn the confrontation into either a heroic stand or a betrayal. It was a consequential disagreement between a player and a club, arriving at the worst possible time for the team.
The Blazers would not provide Parent another Philadelphia season. The franchise’s one year in the city became a brief entry in local hockey history, while his NHL rights remained with Toronto. Parent later said he did not want to return to the Maple Leafs. Getting back to the Flyers depended on a transaction, not merely on his preference. (inquirer.com)
On May 15, 1973, Philadelphia acquired Parent’s rights and a second-round draft pick from Toronto in exchange for a first-round pick and future considerations, according to the Flyers’ transaction record. His return and signing were announced in June. That sequence distinguishes the end of his WHA season from his actual return to the Flyers: leaving one team did not automatically place him on another. (library.sfo2.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com)
Once he was back, the contrast was startling. In 1973–74, Parent became the goalie at the center of the Flyers’ first Stanley Cup championship. Philadelphia won again the following season. The performances that made him a franchise legend belonged to those Flyers teams, not to the Blazers. (nhl.com)
It would be tempting to make the WHA year the explanation for what followed: difficult ice, a contract fight, a playoff walkout, then triumph. Parent’s career does not require that neat a lesson. He had learned from Plante before he joined the Blazers. He had NHL experience before he signed with Miami. His success after returning to the Flyers was his own work within a formidable team, not a result that can be traced to one unhappy season. (nhl.com)
What the Blazers chapter does show is how uncertain the route back was. Parent made a deliberate bet on a new league and a better deal. The team he signed with moved before it played. Its Philadelphia home proved nothing like the Flyers’ home. It fought through a poor start to make the playoffs, only to lose its starting goalie to a dispute over the very promise that had drawn him to the WHA. Even then, another NHL club held the rights that the Flyers needed to acquire.
The Civic Center was not where Parent became the goalie Philadelphia remembers. It was where he played while that future was still unsettled. For one season, the city had Bernie Parent in a Blazers sweater—and no guarantee that he would ever wear a Flyers sweater again. (inquirer.com)
Sources & further reading
- The Philadelphia Inquirer, “In 1972–73, Philly had two pro hockey teams” — The Philadelphia Inquirer
- The Philadelphia Inquirer, Bernie Parent profile — The Philadelphia Inquirer
- Philadelphia Flyers 2024–25 Media Guide — Philadelphia Flyers 2024–25 Media Guide
- Philadelphia Flyers, “Flyers Mourn the Passing of Bernie Parent” — Philadelphia Flyers
- Pennsylvania Heritage, Bernie Parent interview — Pennsylvania Heritage
- NHL.com, “A Special Bond: Plante, Parent and Pelle” — NHL.com
- Hockey-Reference, 1972–73 Philadelphia Blazers — Hockey-Reference